Biomass Fact Sheet Click Here to Download the Massachusetts Sierra Club Policy
www.sierraclubmass.org/msc_biomass_policy_2010a.pdf
For the purposes of this discussion, the term “biomass” refers to
forest/woody biomass and/or the burning of construction and demolition
debris. This policy dos not apply to agricultural waste as fuel, algae
crops, or farm crops which may include switch grass, woody herbaceous crops,
short rotation woody crops such as willow. These topics are addressed in
other Sierra Club energy policy documents.
What is Biomass Energy?
What is Biomass Energy? Biomass energy is the production of energy
(electricity; liquid, solid, and gaseous fuels; and heat) from biomass.
Biomass may be any organic matter including dedicated energy crops and
trees, agricultural food and feed crop residues, aquatic plants, wood and
wood residues, animal wastes and other organic waste, and construction and
demolition debris.
Currently in Massachusetts most biomass that is proposed to be burned
is either from forest and timber products (woody biomass) or construction
and demolition debris.
MA Regulatory Status
Because biomass has been defined under current
statute and regulation as “carbon neutral” and “renewable”, biomass plants
are being promoted aggressively by the state and energy speculators toas
"green" energy. With the passage of the Green Communities Act and other
regulatory initiatives, biomass became classified as renewable energy and
became eligible for incentives to promote its development, including
eligibility under the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard (RPS). Because
CO2 emissions from most types of biomass plants are not counted, some
coal-fired plants in MA are even considering converting to partial or
total biomass energy. While this may take such plants emissions "off the
books" it does not take them out of our atmosphere. This would result in a
net increase of carbon emissions.
Environmental Impacts and Global Climate Change Leading climate
research scientist call for an immediate reduction now of 2 to 3 percent
per year in carbon emissions in order to avoid reaching the “tipping
point” and to stave off the worst impacts of global climate change. A
recent study for the G-8 summit found that even the richest nations are
not on track to meet a “danger threshold’’ of limiting temperature rises
to below 2 degrees Celsius. A massive net release of carbon now from
biomass may make it impossible to achieve these goals.
The Sierra Club has very serious concerns over the administration’s
policy to promote large-scale biomass in the commonwealth as a means to
reach renewable energy targets. The recent "hold" (December 2009) placed
on new facilities eligibility for renewable energy credits pending the
outcome of a newly commissioned state study does not address the multiple
plants already proposed in MA.
Impacts of Biomass Energy include:
- Large scale biomass used primarily for electricity generation is
extremely inefficient and emits 1.5 times as much CO2 than a coal-fired
power plant.
- Claims of “carbon neutrality” for biomass do not account for
externalities and full lifecycle accounting of carbon, including
harvesting processing and transportation of fuels. Truckloads of biomass
fuel would need to be transported on regional roads, adding to diesel
particulate pollution and additional fuel use.
- Large scale biomass calls for the harvesting of millions of trees on
tens of thousands of acres - some of it on state forest lands. Multiple
facilities proposed in MA all claim competing areas for harvesting fuel at
a rate that is not sustainable.
- Biomass consumes and removes organic forest material, including that
which would normally remain behind and contribute to the forests ongoing
ability to sequester carbon.
- Burning biomass can release carcinogenic substances and particulates
in our air water.
- Biomass facilities evaporate and/or otherwise use massive volumes of
water to operate and can impact rivers, streams, and water supplies.
Conclusion
The Sierra Club has significant concerns over the production of energy
from biomass, including the net emissions of CO2 and airborne toxins, the
inefficiency of biomass energy production, impact on ecosystems and public
health, and assumptions made regarding “carbon neutrality” of such
operations.
The Sierra Club opposes the unsustainable exploitation of forest
ecosystems and all biomass energy generation processes which contribute to
the destruction of existing forests, or jeopardize the reestablishment or
protection of biological corridors to link isolated forest stands. The
Sierra Club opposes projects which rely upon ecologically destructive
clear-cutting, in-wood chipping where excessive amounts of biomass are
removed from the land, and conversions to non-native species which
undermine native
The Sierra Club believes there is little likelihood that the current
energy resource potential for forest biomass can be increased sustainably.
Generally, the use of this material as biomass for commercial energy
production creates demand for the byproducts of poor forest management and
logging practices, and increases the pressure to disturb wild forest
ecosystems. Some very small scale biomass-to-energy projects may be
acceptable under strictly controlled conditions, but we are not confident
the regulatory or mitigation framework exists to achieve this goal. This
view is reinforced by the recent decisions to not require environmental
review for plants that will harvest millions of trees from tens of
thousands of acres of forest, as well as burn construction and demolition
debris which releases toxins.
For more information:
For more information please visit
http://massenvironmentalenergy.org/
(This page is under construction)
|